![]() | |
The Casimir Force – Neutral or Electrostatic?T.
V. Prevenslik | |||||||||
![]() |
Since Casimir, experiments performed at ambient temperature have generally
confirmed the Casimir force at gaps less than about 0.2 mm, and since the tests were performed absent pressure
in a vacuum, it can only be concluded that the Casimir force has a thermal origin.
Conversely, a vacuum origin to the Casimir force would be indicated, if the Casimir
force were confirmed [7] in tests near absolute zero. But tests near absolute
zero have never been performed, and therefore the claim that the Casimir effect
produces a force from the ‘nothing’ of the vacuum is speculative, and at the very
least violates the conservation of energy. In contrast, the modified Casmir theory
asserts the ZPE finds its origin in the thermal kT
energy of the atoms on the surfaces of the gaps.
2.1 Thermal
Origin of the Casimir Force
The Casimir
force in the gap is produced by the ZPE that finds origin [8] in the Planck energy
E representing the thermal kT
energy of the atoms on gap surfaces by the harmonic oscillator. The Planck energy
E of the harmonic oscillator [9] is given,
(3)
![]() |
Fig. 2 Thermal Planck Energy E - Harmonic Oscillator at Ambient Temperature
2.2 Source
of ZPE Energy
The ZPE is proposed to find its origin in the cavity
QED induced spontaneous emission of momentarily suppressed IR radiation from groups
of atoms that move into [10] the high frequency VUV cavity. Similarly, static
electricity may be explained [11] by the cavity QED induced spontaneous emission
of suppressed IR radiation from micron size particles trapped in the gap between
contacting surfaces.
In the Casimir effect, the surfaces separated by gap d are
comprised of atoms having thermal kT
energy and emit IR radiation at wavelength l IR. If
d / l IR < 0.1, spontaneous emission
of atoms between conducting parallel plates separated by a gap d is fully
suppressed (Fig. 1 of [12]). Since Fig. 2 shows most of the thermal kT energy at ambient temperature resides
at l IR >
10 mm, and since the Casimir force is only significant
[4] in the VUV at d < 0.10 mm, the
IR radiation is fully suppressed by cavity QED as d / l IR <<
0.01. The IR radiation from surface area
A comprised of atoms having thermal
kT energy is suppressed because the
gap always undergoes fluctuations O(d) on the order of atomic dimensions,
the fluctuations intermittently moving a number NA of atoms into
the VUV resonant gap, i.e., NA
= A O(d) / D3, where
D is the
spacing between atoms in the surface at solid density. Since the atomic emission
occurs at half IR wavelengths ˝ l IR >
d , the
EM energy UEM suppressed by cavity QED,
(4)
Typically,
D ~ 0.3
nm. To conserve EM energy, the sub-surface atoms spontaneously emit at least half
of the VUV radiation into the gap. The number NP of VUV photons spontaneously emitted having Planck energy
EVUV,
(5)
To illustrate
the modified Casimir theory, assume a fluctuation of NA = 1010 atoms.
For a single layer of atoms, O(d) = D, the NA atoms cover a circular surface area A = 3.1x10-10 m2
having a diameter of about 20 mm. Prior
to the fluctuation, the atoms have thermal kT energy of 0.0258 eV while the boundary conditions on the gap d = 0.1
mm require a ZPE having an EM resonant wavelength
lc = 0.2
and EVUV = 6.2 eV. Steady heat transfer from the surroundings
provides a continuous supply of thermal kT energy to compensate for the cavity QED induced spontaneous emission
of suppressed EM energy. From equations
4 and 5, UEM = 62 pJ and
the number NP = 3.1x107 of VUV photons.
2.3 Field Ionization
The electric
field induced in the gap surface by the spontaneous emission of far IR photons
induces the ionization of surface atoms to produce electrons and charged atomic
states. Dependent solely on the power P
produced in the particle while avoiding arguments of coherency of multi-IR photons,
field ionization is significant because the thermal kT energy is induced by cavity QED to undergo
spontaneous emission over very short times.
Laser
induced field relations [13] may be used to quantify field ionization induced
by cavity QED. Consider the gap surface atoms as a laser spontaneously emitting
a short pulse of coherent thermal kT
energy at far IR frequencies. The power
P,
(6)
where,
t
is the time of spontaneous emission. At the gap surface area A, the laser intensity I
is,
(7)
where,
m0
is the permeability of free space.
The electric field Ef is,
(8)
Assuming
a spontaneous emission time t
< 100 ps, equations (6) and (7) give the laser power P > 620 mW and intensity I > 2 GW×m-2.
In equation 8, taking O(d) = D gives
the surface field Ef > 8.7 x105 V×m-1
suggesting electrons are liberated from the Au surface atoms by field ionization.
2.4 Photoelectric
Yield
Photoelectric
yields gP are
generally thought to be a function of the surface material, but may also depend
on geometry. Indeed, microscopic particles are known [14] to have significantly
higher yields than for the bulk surface. In Casimir force [4,5] experiments, microspheres
and plates are common, and although both are usually Au coated, may not have the
same yield.
Generally, the Casimir force only begins to be come significant below gaps
d < 0.1 mm, or
at EM resonant wavelengths lc <
0.2 mm. This is consistent with the work function W of most metals that gives the Planck
energy EVUV below which electrons
are not produced, i.e., electrons are not produced if EVUV < W. For example, the work functions W of Au and Al are about 4 eV that is equivalent
to an EM resonant wavelength lc ~
0.3 mm, or
a gap d ~ 0.15
mm. For Al and Au coated gap surfaces, the photoelectron
yield gP data
( Fig. 2 of [15] ) for EVUV
from 4-12 eV is approximated by,
(9)
where,
EVUV is in eV.
For EVUV = 6.2 eV,
the photoelectric yield gP = 4.5x10-6.
2.5 Number
of Electrons and Electrical Charge
The number
Ne of electrons produced
depends on the number NP
of VUV photons and the photoelectric yield gP of the
gap surfaces in electrons per photon,
(10)
In the
Casimir force experiments, both the sphere and flat plate are usually Au coated,
and therefore there may not be any difference in the photoelectric yield gP. If
so, the net charge Q produced is zero
and there is no Casimir force in the modified theory. But the coatings are not
likely identical, and geometrical effects may be significant. Hence, a parameter
h <
1 is used to characterize the mismatch of otherwise identical materials, the charge
Q produced,
(11)
Here
the charge Q is upper bound by taking
h = 1,
or a perfect mismatch of photoelectric yields. For the photoelectric yield gP = 4.5x10-6
and number NP = 3.1x107
of VUV photons, the number of electrons Ne = 140 and charge Q = 2.2x10-17
C.
2.6 Casimir
Force
The VUV
radiation in the gap in combination with the photoelectric yields of gap surfaces
means electrical charge Q is produced,
and therefore the modified Casimir force Fc is attractive finding its origin in electrostatics,
(12)
where,
eo is the
permittivity of free space. For the Ne
= 140 electrons and gap d = 0.1
mm, the modified Casimir force Fc = 4.5x10-10 N.
For comparison, a 0.1 mm gap
gives an experimental [4] Casimir force
Fexp = 1.4x10-10 N.
The Casimir force Fc
for the standard and modified theory normalized to the force Fc,0.1 at gap d = 0.1
mm are compared by maintaining the same heat flow,
(13)
Combining,
(14)
Similarly, the number Ne of electrons is,
(15)
In contrast,
the Casimir force in the Standard Theory,
(16)
where, the gap d is in microns. The range on d is from 0.1 to 0.05 mm corresponding to wavelength
lc range form 0.2 to 0.1 mm, or Planck energy EVUV from 6.2 to about 12 eV.
Casimir forces in the modified theory are significantly higher than by the standard theory. Fig. 3 shows the Casimir force in the modified theory is about 6 orders of magnitude greater than that by the standard theory at a gap of 0.05 mm. Similarly, the number of electrons increases rapidly below as contact is approached.

3
CONCLUSIONS
A
modified Casimir theory is presented to explain the interaction between bodies
separated by gaps less than about 0.1 mm, the conclusions of which are summarized as follows:
The modified Casimir force between bodies separated by an evacuated gap
is attractive and finds its origin in electrostatics because of electrical charge
produced by the bodies. The electrical charge is produced by the photoelectric
effect from the field ionization of surface atoms induced by the spontaneous emission
of thermal kT energy by cavity QED.
In the MEMS device, the permanent adhesion observed upon contact cannot be caused by neutral surfaces. Electrostatic discharge is a more likely explanation, but the standard Casimir theory is based on an attractive force between neutral bodies.
The modified Casimir force
based on electrical charge build-up may occur even as a current flowing in the
ground between the bodies dissipates the charge. But the rapid increase in charge
for gaps less than 0.1 mm suggests that measurements of current rather than force may be a meaningful
measure of the Casimir force.
In the modified Casimir theory,
the ZPE finds its origin in the thermal kT energy of the atoms, and therefore the ZPE and the Casimir force
cannot exist at absolute zero.
[1]
Casimir H B G 1948 Proc.
Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap 51 793.
[2]
Bressi G, Carugno G, Onofrioet
R and Ruouso G 2002 Measurement of the Casimir Force between Parallel Metallic
Surfaces Phys. Rev. Lett. 88
041804 (1-4).
[3]
Lamoreaux S K 1996 Demonstration of the Casimir Force in
the 0.6 to 6 mm Range Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5-8.
[4]
Mohideen U, Roy A 1998 Precision Measurement of the Casimir
Force from 0.1 to 0.9 mm Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4549-52.
[5]
Chan H B, Aksyuk V A, Kleiman R N, Bishop D J and Capasso
F 2001 Quantum Mechanical Actuation of Microelectromechanical Systems by the Casimir
Force Science 291 1941-4.
[6]
Buks E, and Roukes M L 2001 Metastbility and the Casimir
effect in micromechanical systems Europhys. Lett. 54 220-6.
[7]
Genet C, Lambrecht A and Reynaud S 2000 Temperature dependence
of the Casimir effect between metallic mirrors Phys. Rev. A. 62 012110
(1-8).
[8]
Planck M Theory of
Heat, 1932 Translated by H. L. Brose, Mac Millan, London.
[9]
Christy R W and Pytte A The Structure of Matter: Introduction to Modern Physics, Benjamin,
New York, 1965.
[10]
Harouche S and Raimond J-M 1993 Quantum Electrodynamics
Scientific American, April 54. .
[11]
Prevenslik T V 2002 Cavity QED induced Photoelectric Effect ESA Proceedings, Northwestern University,
June 25-28.
[12]
Alves
D T, Farina C and Tort A C 2000 Spontaneous
emission between two parallel plates, one or both infinitely permeable Phys.
Rev. A 61
034102 (1-4).
[13]
Halliday D and Resnick R 1988 Fundamentals of Physics, Third Edition
Extended, J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
[14]
Schleicher
B, Burtscher H and Siegmann H C 1993 Photoelectric quantum yield of nanometer
metal particles Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 1191-3.
[15]
Feuerbacher B and Fitton B 1972 Experimental investigation
of photoemission from satellite surface materials J. Appl. Phys. 43 1563-72.